독일 일반 면세 구매대행
임시 중단 안내
안녕하세요. 오마이집입니다.
더 나은 서비스를 위해
독일 일반 면세 구매대행 서비스를 임시 중단합니다.
새로운 모습으로 빠른 시일 내 다시 인사드리겠습니다.
감사합니다.
US
DE
498 Centerpoint Blvd
[사서함번호]
New Castle, DE, 19720
302-322-8792
* 항공운송만 가능
US
CA
2601 Walnut Ave
[사서함번호]
Tustin, CA, 92780
714-676-7274
* 해상운송만 가능
China
山东省威海市 环翠区 苘山镇
福州路9号 顺丰速递北20米
[사서함번호]
264414
156-8451-3564
* 항공&해상운송 가능
Germany
WarpEx [사서함번호]
Carl-Benz Str. 35
Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Deutschland
60386
0614-2482-9236
* 항공운송만 가능
Korea
서울시 강서구 마곡중앙6로 11 보타닉파크타워3 405호
[사서함번호]
07801
070-5228-2983
Japan
福岡県 福岡市東区
和白東1丁目16-15 HANIRO
[사서함번호]
811-0214
092-608-7642
* 해상운송만 가능
고객센터 알림
NO | 안내시간 | 수취인명 | 신청서번호 | 알림내용 |
---|
* 알림 내용을 클릭하면 해당 페이지로 이동합니다.
Delaware
$55.95
책 정보
출판사 | Independently Published |
---|---|
저자 | Landmark Publications |
판형 | Paperback |
ISBN-13 | 9798579610690 |
발행일 | 2020/12/11 |
언어 | eng |
무게 (LB) | 1.58 |
주제 분류
책 소개
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret, and apply provisions of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972. Volume 2 of the casebook covers the Sixth through the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. * * * Title IX provides: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance." 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a). Though the statute contains no express private right of action, the Supreme Court has held that individuals may sue funding recipients for violating Title IX. See Cannon v. Univ. of Chi., 441 U.S. 677, 717, 99 S.Ct. 1946, 60 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); Franklin v. Gwinnett Cty. Pub. Schs., 503 U.S. 60, 76, 112 S.Ct. 1028, 117 L.Ed.2d 208 (1992). And the Court has held that this implied right of action includes retaliation claims, explaining that "when a funding recipient retaliates against a person because he complains of sex discrimination, this constitutes intentional 'discrimination' 'on the basis of sex, ' in violation of Title IX." Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ., 544 U.S. 167, 174, 125 S.Ct. 1497, 161 L.Ed.2d 361 (2005). * * * The Supreme Court's decision in Jackson did not spell out the elements of a Title IX retaliation claim, and no published case in this circuit has decided the question. In unpublished authority, however, we have analogized to Title VII retaliation claims, stating that a Title IX plaintiff must show "that (1) [s]he engaged in protected activity, (2) [the funding recipient] knew of the protected activity, (3) [s]he suffered an adverse school-related action, and (4) a causal connection exists between the protected activity and the adverse action." Gordon v. Traverse City Area Pub. Schs., 686 F. App'x 315, 320 (6th Cir. 2017). Our sister circuits apply similar tests. See, e.g., Emeldi v. Univ. of Or., 698 F.3d 715, 724 (9th Cir. 2012); Papelino v. Albany Coll. of Pharmacy of Union Univ., 633 F.3d 81, 89 (2d Cir. 2011); Frazier v. Fairhaven Sch. Comm., 276 F.3d 52, 67 (1st Cir. 2002). Bose v. Bea, 947 F. 3d 983 (6th Cir. 2020)
트래킹 도착 조회
조회
조회 결과가 없는 경우, 센터로 상품이 도착하지 않은 것이니 판매처로 문의해주시기 바랍니다.
배송신청서에 이미 입고처리가 된 건이나 미작성 입고로 안내된 건은 조회가 되지 않습니다.